Piermont, part 1 of 1
Notes from a live deal
Keeping a sale moving is mostly keeping track of what everyone is waiting for.
Context
In summer 2025 I was an M&A and restructuring summer analyst at Piermont, a boutique investment bank. The role came from someone I had first cold-emailed as a freshman and kept in touch with over the following year.
The problem
At GreensLedge I had learned how products are built. At Piermont I was on a live deal: a company being sold. A sale has many moving parts, a buyer and seller, lawyers, accountants, a deal team, and a clock. Buyers ask hundreds of questions in due diligence,1 and every unanswered one slows the process down.
What I did
- Supported the deal through to closing. I helped the team build the valuation work for a sell-side M&A deal, including discounted cash flow analysis and trading comparables, and stayed on it until it closed.
- Made the research reusable. Pitch preparation kept starting from scratch. I built more than five market reports the team could reuse, which cut pitch preparation time by about a fifth.
- Kept the questions moving. During the live deal I organized and tracked more than 50 due diligence requests: who had asked what, who owed the answer, and what was still open. Buyers got their answers about 10% faster.
What I learned
The most valuable work on a live deal wasn’t the most sophisticated. It was keeping track of what everyone was waiting for. A model can be perfect and the deal still stalls because one answer sat in someone’s inbox for a week.
Finance trained me in analysis and in the discipline of executing carefully under time pressure. But by the end of that summer I noticed something else: I was most engaged by the parts of the work that touched how the business actually ran, not the transaction itself. That pull got stronger over the next year.
Footnotes
-
Due diligence is the buyer’s investigation of the business before agreeing to the deal: financials, contracts, operations, risks. ↩